Global Corporations for Global Causes

The LGBTQ+ Agenda

Global Corporations and the UN

Synthetic Sex Candidate for the Technocracy describes Cigna’s addition of a job position for a National Director of Transgender Health a decade ago. Robert McLaughlin has held this position in the years since after masking his identity with synthetic breasts, surgically altered facial features, and claiming “womanhood” as Renee. Global masters thirsting for control over man’s destiny have led to this astonishing feat. Sexed bodies are a target. A victim’s age is of no consequence. They are attempting to create a new class of human, the transgender man, and they have been at it for decades.

Cigna’s recent business ventures in assisted reproduction help explain the corporation’s disregard for the sexed reality of man as male or female. Before exploring these ventures it is necessary to understand Cigna’s position as a global corporation for global causes.

The ringmaster for the corporate elite is the United Nations (UN) founded in 1945 whose member states comprise most world countries. If there is anything obvious in recent years it is that UN agendas are not always in line with human flourishing but instead in line with corporate interests. Health and environmental agendas sometimes harm citizens. The LGBTIQ+ agenda is among these. This agenda and its role in UN corporate partnerships are discussed here.

The UN system includes several programs that take up the mantle for LGBTIQ+ rights while others fall under the wrath of its agenda. UN’s Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is where the LGBTQ+ agenda spreads its tentacles through comprehensive sexual education (CSE) to the children of the world. Of course CSE includes “gender ideology” where children learn the impossible, they can be born the wrong sex.

In January 1999 an announcement came at the WEF Annual Meeting that a UN Global Compact would be established. This compact launched at UN Headquarters in NYC in 2000 with 9 guiding principles. A 10th was added in 2004.

The UN Global Compact is considered “the world’s largest sustainability initiative.” They claim this public private compact is “to encourage companies to respect universal principles and contribute to a more sustainable and inclusive global economy.” Cross out “universal” for “corporate” and this is closer to their agenda. Sustaining the nature of man is not a goal here. Instead they support a global view of the human body as parts to be manipulated and marketed for the global technocracy. The focus is broad covering “environment, social, governance, sustainable development goals, finance and supply chain.” It captures it all while leading humanity into a bleak future.

For participation in the UN Global Compact members submit annual “Communication of Progress” and financially contribute to its foundation. Contributions from wealthier countries help establish networks in other countries. The foundation informs that “public-private collaboration is essential to find lasting solutions to growing pressing problems.” When the nature of man is a problem and the fix is the manipulation of man into a biosynthetic being, citizens should be worried.

Woman are offered as a front for “gender equality” while the creep of novel and impossible “genders” tramples women’s rights and safety. Racial equality is offered as a front for the new LGBTIQ+ civil rights agenda while the rights of minorities are abused for a lie. But sex, race, and the makings of synthetic man via procedures like male castration, female phalloplasty, and assisted reproductive technology are not all of the natural order. The horrors of transgender medicine are the twisted makings of an industry that has lost faith in the natural order of creation. Under the broad banners of gender equality and civil rights LGBTIQ+ hides its true colors. Child abuse, family estrangement, genital mutilation, sexual paraphilias, pornography, infertility, significant medical harms, and more are the norm.

The UN Global Compact provides a plan for achieving the goals of Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement with 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for business that were unveiled in 2015. Do not be fooled by the nice sounding words of UN principals and goals. It is what lies behind these words that are alarming. In 2020 a corporate LGBTIQ+ partnership began to further their agenda. A brief history of the UN LGBTIQ+ agenda is first necessary to understand how LGB and TIQ+ operate as a corporate juggernaut.

The “Gender” March to Conquer Sex

Sexual orientation was first added to the General Assembly Resolution in 2000. In 2005 it was first mentioned in a joint statement at the Commission on Human Rights. “Gender identity” was fast on its heels. In 2006 a joint statement on sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) was presented at the General Assembly (GA) by Norway on behalf of 54 countries. In 2008 the UN LGBTI Core Group was established. By 2011 the first  SOGI resolution was passed at the UN General Assembly. At this time it was supported by 23 countries. Discriminatory laws, practices and acts of violence began to be documented.

In 2013 a full-on campaign to push sympathy for the LGBTIQ+ cause launched called Free and Equal. A billboard in Times Square was soon followed by a rainbow crosswalk rolled out for a UN GA and more. Campaigns were first unveiled in key places like New York, Mumbai, London, and Paris with more and more places targeted as the campaign gained steam. In 2022 UN Free & Equal combined forces with UN Women, a group that now embrace “gender” beliefs over sexed reality and help create a dangerous world for their sex.

Instead of supporting women, they cheer as gay men in drag like Conchita Wurst are among the faces of UN campaigns.

Conchita’s performances might lure allies but the goal is met when lives become performance via drugs and surgeries. The UN also pushes campaigns with famous and not so famous people who have taken that leap with synthetic sex identities.  

In 2016 a UN Independent Expert on SOGI was created. The first of these “experts,” Vitit Muntarbhorn co-chaired the drafting of the Yogyakarta Principles. These principles were adopted in 2017 adding SOGI to international law. In Exposing the Lie of the Transgender Child, Jennifer Bilek exposes the money fueling that adoption. Behind it is found American Jon Stryker, owner of Stryker Medical Corporation and founder of Arcus Foundation supporting the cause. The most recent UN “expert,” Graeme Reid, hails from Human Rights Watch, a pivotal organization discussed below.  

In 2021, SOGI gets another mention in the UN GA resolution. This time the documentation of LGBTIQ+ discrimination and Free and Equal campaigns had served their purpose and state sponsorship increases from 23 to 87.

A Corporate Partnership for the LGBTIQ+

Tucked below the nice words of the SDGs and the slick advertising of the LGBTIQ+ would soon come The Partnership for UN Global LGBTIQ+ Equality (PGLE). This partnership was announced in 2020, 20 years after sexual orientation was added to the UN General Resolution and the UN Global Compact was unveiled.

PGLE is a coalition committed to accelerating LGBTIQ+ equality and inclusion globally through business. This initiative stems from, the World Economic Forum (WEF), the UN Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Sustainable Business Network (BSR).

WEF is a non-profit established in 1971 guiding global public-private initiatives. A WEF article claims the PGLE stemmed from a WEF 2016 panel discussion and is part of the Centre for New Economy and New Society. They say inclusivity will prevent the economic losses of discrimination. In reality inclusivity enhances corporate wealth in novel markets which will be part of their new society.

OHCHR is the leading UN entity on human rights where the Universal Declaration of Human Rights can be found. This declaration dates to 1948 and today has 30 concise articles. Today this declaration is accompanied by a 100+ page document first published in 2014, and again in 2019, titled “Born Free and Equal.” It attempts to explain how SOGI fits into the declaration. But it makes no sense. The document informs that “most people have a gender identity, which is part of their identity.” This is preposterous and leads to other claims like the need for legal recognition and the need to depathologize the thing they call “gender identity.” “Transgender,” they want citizens to believe, is just a way to be human.

Sustaining Business over the Natural Order of Man

The BSR launched in the 1990s and claims to be “a sustainable business network and consultancy focused on creating a world in which all people can thrive on a healthy planet.” Focus is on progressive environmental and social policy. Cross out social policy for social engineering and this is more like it.

In 2024 BSR published a guide for financial institutions called Navigating Rollbacks in Reproductive and LGBTQI+ Rights in the US: A Guide for Financial Institutions. Here human rights are exchanged for human lies and financial capital.

In the financial guide they cover the wave of legislation pushing back on an agenda that today blocks puberty, castrates boys, removes the breasts of girls, and other horrors. Dissent, they claim, is driven by “political extremism, societal intolerance, and a coordinated attack against companies that consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when doing business.” The sex organs of children today are fodder for compliance.

This has a “chilling effect” on financial institutions, they say, who must now, “comply with the law while upholding the reproductive and LGBTQI+ rights of their customers, users, and workforce.” Just how does a business abide to 2 masters? Permitting out of network solutions for gender-affirming care and leaving a jurisdiction are possible remedies offered. Be assured this financial guide should have a chilling effect on families who want to raise children as intact males and females.

BSR “spark members” are the "invite-only exclusive” members American Express, the Coca-Cola company, Google, and Microsoft. Hundreds of corporate members round out BSR membership. Tides, founded by Drummond Pike, is an associate member, an organization whose foundation is tied to funding the agenda at hand.

BSRs 2024 financial report notes, “The Standards do not come with a mechanism to monitor their application.” But they do offer guidelines. In 2021 PGLE launched the UN LGBTIQ+ Standards Gap Analysis Tool. For now this is a voluntary assessment tool that uses the OHCHR’s UN Standards of Conduct for Business in Tackling Discrimination against LGBTIQ+ People (2017). These standards include “respect human rights,” “eliminate discrimination,” and others that might sound nice but in reality supporters aid and abet medical atrocities, ones that happen to children.  

Aside from OHCHR, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Outright International provided “expert” reviews for the analysis tool. Each play pivotal roles in global LGBTQ+ initiatives.

“Expert”: Human Rights Watch and an “Expert” Report

HRW began as Helsinki Watch in 1978 with a focus on the ravishes of war. They took on the name Human Rights Watch in 1988. The HIV/AIDS crisis led to work in health and human rights. When LGB morphed into LGBT, HRW pivoted to the transgender cause. Today the group is not just helping combat the ravishes of war or disease but fighting the natural order of man himself.

In 2001 HRW published a report, titled Hatred in the Hallways: Violence and Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, bisexual, and Transgender Students in US Schools. This report is astounding for many reasons but not for the size of the study it involved. The report focuses on 140 LGBT youth and 130 adults like parents and teachers. 8 students are considered “transgender.” Participants hailed from a handful of states. The study lasted one year beginning in 1999. In reality this was a little study with huge implications.

For such a little study, the report can be found in high places. It is housed in the Global Law and Policy Database at the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and at the US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.

From the report:

This report contains evidence of the substantial failure of the government at the local, state, and federal level to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students from human rights violations, including harassment, violence, and deprivation of the right to education. Human Rights Watch calls for immediate actions by the state to end these abuses.

That is quite a statement for this little study that is found in high places. Report recommendations include the need to “protect youth from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity” and the need for training on these topics. Remember there were 8 students claiming to be “transgender” and “transgender” was not noted at the UN until 2006. Few citizens likely knew what “gender identity” was in 1999 when this study began.

Who was giving students “gender identity” language to describe themselves in 1999? Those in industry, they knew the scripted language.

The few confused children and their distraught families, they did not know this scripted language in 1999. They soon learned though when the masters of industry and their foot soldiers in medicine told them that they were, “born in the wrong body” and therefore “transgender.” Words with industry backing have continued to indoctrinate scores of youth across the western world and it all began before the turn of the century.

The extensive list of participants and funders provides clues. Again this is quite a list for a little study. The list of contributors exceeds 140 individuals and over 50 groups, schools, or organizations. Grants and funding came from no fewer than 9 organizations.

For years the push of LGB throughout the culture had contributed to the rise in groups supporting the cause. The AIDS crisis bolstered support and programs especially from industry that profited from the crisis. When the banner changed to LGBTQ+ it was an easy embrace. Money flowing for the expanding acronym permitted a growth of programs. At this time medicine and social engineering were part and parcel of industry.

Take for instance study contributor Caitlyn Ryan. At the time of the study in 1999 Ryan worked at SFSU in the Research Institute on Sexuality, Social Inequality and Health. Ryan got her start in industry during the AIDS crisis. In 2002 she launched the Family Acceptance Project (FAP) at SFSU. According to the website, “[FAP] includes the first comprehensive study of LGBTQ youth and their families and the first evidence-informed family support model to help diverse families learn to support their LGBTQ children.” At FAP “rejecting behaviors” are exhibited in families desiring children to reach maturity as the males or females they were born.

Those who earned their fame and fortune supporting the legal rights of homosexuals are now at the helm of the new legal agenda for trans rights. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), and Lambda Legal are among contributors to the study. Fame and fortune ensues for these legal experts. FTM Shannon Minter is one lawyer who contributed to this study and remains committed to the agenda. Minter in 1999 was a staff attorney at NCLR in San Francisco. Today this woman claiming manhood is the legal director.

Another study contributor, NGO Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educator’s Network (GLSEN) was founded in the 90s to support the LGB cause. They too welcomed the T when the time came. They claim to do “research” and develop “appropriate” resources for educators. Indoctrinated educators are in charge. They now have chapters and thousands of Gay Straight Alliances operating in schools throughout the US where students learn about “gender identity.”

Contributor FTM International is the first organization for female to male (FTM) transsexuals in the US started by FTM Louis Sullivan. It all started when this woman claiming manhood began a newsletter in San Francisco the late 80s. Sullivan passed the baton to FTM Jamison Green upon her death in 1991. Green would go on to become a member of WPATH and was featured in the WPATH files exposé. Green also played a role in HRC’s Transgender-Inclusive Health Insurance Research Initiative.

Big funders contributed to this little study too. Open Society Institute (OSI) is one of them. OSI was started by George Soros in 1993 and was rebranded to Open Society Foundation (OSF) in 2010. Also in 2010 OSF announced a $100M challenge grant over 10 years to BSR. HRW just needed to match it with another $100M. At the time it was the largest grant Soros had ever given an NGO. George Soros is among the Rich White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology.

The 8 “transgender” students in this study and the multitude of contributors have helped fuel quite a movement.

“Expert”: Outright International

The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) was started by activist Julie Dorf in 1990. Today Dorf co-chairs the Council for Global Equality, a coalition of 32 organizations for U.S. inclusive foreign policy. Many of the NGOs mentioned in this post are among them including HRW, WPATH, OSI, and others. She is also a board member for HRW’s LGBT Rights Program.

IGLHRC’s early campaign focus was LGB rights in Russia. Latin American, Asia, Africa and other countries were added over the years. AIDS, asylum, documenting harms, and digital campaigns have been among their endeavors. In 2008 they launched their OutSpoken Award recognizing Catholic Bishop Desmond Tutu as a global ally. No one is left out of this agenda.

IGLHRC and the UN have close ties. It is IGLHRC that started the UN LGBTI Core Group in 2008 noted above. It is this team that went on to create the UN Independent Expert on SOGI. It is also this team that are consultants to the UN Economic and Social Council. The newly appointed executive director, Maria Sjodin, happens to sit on the steering committee of PGLE, the LGBTQ+ global partnership.

In 2015 IGLHRC became Outright Action International. This same year they partnered with CUNY Law School and launched their first conference, OutSummit, a conference that is now an annual event.

In 2021 Outright’s Global Trans Program launched. MTF Rikki Nathanson is the face of that effort. This man claiming womanhood can be heard asking in a promotional video, “Does the doctor know how to use the correct pronouns to address them?” A better question would be, “Does the doctor know how to diagnosis a ‘transgender’ person?”

The answer to that question is a resounding no. There are no “transgender” people. There are only delusions, indoctrinations, medical protocols that mask reality, and a fascist / corporate cabal convincing the world this is real.

The Juggernaut Marches On

There exists a dizzying array and incestuous bunch of people and organizations propelled forward by massive funding. They call themselves “experts,” they call their work “research,” they award each other, they throw events like conferences and parades, and they establish benchmarks to further the agenda. “Pride on Promenade” was just held at a recent WEF meeting. It was organized by the corporate LGBTIQ+ organization, PGLE. Participating were their mostly American multinational corporate members. The cheering is incessant as people are harmed and corporations get wealthy. The pace is swift, the money is flowing, and in a relentless Goebbels style propaganda, they surge full steam ahead in solidarity with industry.

Before unraveling Cigna’s adherence to the global masters the next post will examine founders of the PGLE.