9 Comments
User's avatar
Elisabeth Robson's avatar

"No one thinks that people with body integrity disorder should be eligible for limb amputations save for the surgeons keen on amputations." and "Will they be able to leave people alone today or in the future?"

I often wonder if genital mutilation will morph into limb amputations--easy enough if the amputee fetishists make it "cool" and "trendy". And the "gender" ghouls have no desire to leave people alone... it's very clear their wish is to continue their gruesome experiments, and goodness knows where it will all lead.

Expand full comment
A A's avatar

Thank you for yet another very informative article. As the mother of a female victim of “gender affirming” surgeries and an Aunt to a precious boy born with XXY chromosomes, this information is an inevitable double stab to my heart. My nephew with XXY chromosomes - a cruel condition, tragically died from aspiration due to pneumonia at age 34. This was after 2 surgeries to remove his testicles because of severe groin pain. Doctors never discovered the root cause of his pain. My daughter's doctors still won't write that she is disabled, which denies her federal money owed to her. They allegedly verbally acknowledge her disability, yet won't write it down. Why? The government who paid to sterilize and mutilate my perfectly healthy daughter should pay dearly. Thank you. ❤️

Expand full comment
Mothers Grim's avatar

It is truly horrifying what families have had to endure - intersex and gender indoctrinated. So sorry, AA.

Expand full comment
Frontera Lupita's avatar

None of these people who are “victim of gender affirming surgeries”, have no idea of the long term consequences to their health, their lives and lifestyles. They are never told what the “road ahead” looks like years down the road for them, by these ‘healthcare professionals and hospitals’ that engage in these type of genital and physical mutilation surgeries. I am sure they are not given true ‘informed consent’ when entering into these life altering (on so many levels) “mutilation surgeries”.

Expand full comment
A A's avatar

Indeed, most are diagnosed with multiple mental health disorders, including my daughter. Yet psychopathic doctors move to harm them in any way possible.

Expand full comment
Frontera Lupita's avatar

So it’s ok to influence a person with “gender identity” and “mental health” issues to have these “life altering” surgeries without ‘informed consent’? It’s all so messed up!

Expand full comment
Frontera Lupita's avatar

Excellent Substack…and though it’s a small thing of note within the comment below if feel it is still worth noting, even though it doesn’t really pertain to the discussion at hand (and I am aware of this).

Many people are not aware that in the State of CA, where I presume these two women reside, there is no such thing as a “common law wife” or a “common law husband”.

The State of CA does not recognize “Common Law Marriage”. I know, because I was in a long term live in relationship/partnership with a man for over 20 plus years. I walked away from the partnership with my personal possessions and memories and that is about it.

Gay couples in CA can marry, or register as “domestic partners” which gives their relationships legal status in the eyes of the State of CA. So are Tamar-Mattis and Suegee Tamar Mattis in a “registered domestic partnership”, or a “common law marriage”? Because that is not a recognized legal union in the State of CA.

“Tamar-Mattis is a lawyer who had long worked with LGBTI communities infiltrated by the medical agenda at hand. She was the first director of San Francisco’s LGBT Community Center. Her common law wife is physician Suegee Tamar-Mattis, the founder of the transgender clinic at Santa Rosa Community Health Centers.”

Expand full comment
Mothers Grim's avatar

interesting - edited to read 'partner' until I learn more. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Frontera Lupita's avatar

I only commented because when I was separating from my partner, I had so many people tell me that since I had lived with this person for so long (and were ‘engaged’ with a ring and all for a part of that time) I was in a ‘common law marriage” and I had “rights” to the house we lived in (which he owned) and other stuff. I had heard in CA that “common law marriage” wasn’t recognized, so I took a deep dive into “common law marriage”. Sorry ladies and gentlemen you have no rights unless you are “married” with a valid “marriage license” or are registered as “domestic partners”. And in CA those are reserved for “same sex couples” and in the case of a “opposite sex couple”, one partner is 62 years old.

These “domestic partnerships” allow for things like community property rights and health insurance benefits, but do not provide the ability to file taxes jointly and “other rights afforded in a marriage”.

Expand full comment