Breast Offerings

The Quest of an Industry

Painting of Saint Agatha by Andrea Vaccaro Ca. 1635

Many people pass by places like the one in South Florida without another thought. If people knew what went on behind the doors they might be alarmed. When my own daughter left for college I had no idea places such as this had become fixtures in US healthcare. Women from all over the world flock to such facilities in ritualistic fashion to pay homage to the modern religion of ‘gender.’ These are medical facilities where penance is not offered for sins but for being ‘born in the wrong body.’ Offerings are personal sex organs. For this particular center the offerings are only female breasts, the most common organs offered up in sexual reassignment surgery (SRS) centers across the US today.

The American Cancer Society calls breasts, “accessory organs of the female reproductive system.” Any given sex reassignment surgeon might surgically remove these organs on otherwise healthy females several times a day. But that is not all. Chests are then refashioned into simulacrums of the male sex. The nipples are resized, removed, and restitched into a male-like position. Chest contours are reworked. Sometimes a nipple falls off. Some patients opt for tattooed nipples. Others have the surgeon render their female chests devoid of sex characteristics altogether. Sex reassignment surgeon Scott Mosser explains this modern horror with a short video.

If a “better” version of feminine attributes can be created so can physical attributes that scream, “not feminine at all.” Welcome to the 21st Century where ‘boob jobs,’ ‘top surgeries,’ and ‘nonbinary’ or ‘nullification’ surgeries are all fair game. In the medical landscape today doing just about anything to anybody for any reason at all is normalized. Gatekeeping is all but gone.

Unlike breast augmentation surgery, usually considered cosmetic in the absence of disease, FTM (female to male) and FTN (female to nonbinary) surgeries have received the added benefits of diagnoses, medical codes, insurance coverage, and although now being challenged, government funding. Females can now cut them off altogether at little or no charge.

In 1989 a Los Angeles Times article reported that through the 1950s females accounted for 6% of the US transgender population but that had increased to near 25% by the late 80s. Medical advances and media attention are offered as reasons, but the article also dangles an industry’s golden fruit, “gender identity.” ‘Gender identity’ was the belief that needed to be instilled in the populace. The only way out of a cross sex identity was to ‘transition.’ This was the message the world was to believe. Today increases are seen across the board for both sexes with females now the dominant patient population all while younger and younger victims are seduced into SRS centers. Is it any wonder female breasts are the most sacrificed organs to the gender gods? A populace has been psychologically manipulated to believe it necessary.

The modern ‘transgender’ man has been born. It is the civil right of the modern era. As normalization takes place a system is constructed to monopolize further services. A social determinants of health (SDOH) model of healthcare waits in the wings for neutered and broken bodies to be the specimens for further experimentation. Doors are thrown open for markets in ART, IVF, surrogacy, transplantation, ectogenesis and more. Populations are groomed to be easy targets.

Institutional Embrace

The spring 2022 issue of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Medicine’s Biological Sciences Division quarterly, Medicine on the Midway is dedicated to “the profound journey of LGBTQ+ healthcare.”

The article dribbles on for a full 8 pages hyping the schools embrace of transgender medicine since 2015 when it first received the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) designation of Healthcare Equality Leader. Things like removing the word ‘mother’ from what was once called ‘Mother Baby Unit’ and the word ‘women’ from what was once called ‘Women’s Health Center’ get mentions. Also praised are the launch of the Transgender Center for Affirmation and Reproduction, Pritzker’s LGBTQ+ student medical organization, and various medical ‘gender’ initiatives spawned across the country by Pritzker graduates. Sexed reality is out in the medical world created at this institution. It could not be prouder.

The article opens by first paying homage to 1966 Pritzker SOM graduate, Michael Brownstein. After graduation from Chicago and completing his surgical residency, Brownstein trained in plastic surgery at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). There he became enticed by the field of transgender surgery and where he met fellow homosexual, Paul Walker. Walker was a co-founder of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (HBIGDA). HBIGDA launched in 1977 when most gender clinics at academic institutions were being forced to close shop. It became the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) in 2006. As in the 1970s contemporary citizens are again awakening to shocking pseudoscientific experiments that rage on. Only now it is far worse.

Brownstein Opens a Clinic

In 1977 Brownstein opened a plastic surgery practice in the Bay area. He claims to have received his first referral for female bilateral chest reconstruction from HBIGDA’s Paul Walker. The rest is history.

Many consider Brownstein to be the first to perform ‘top surgery’ or chest masculinization surgery in the modern era. The famous (Chaz Bono), and the not so famous, flocked to him. “I got my top done with Brownstein in Oakland,” are the words of an actor playing the role of a ‘transmale’ in a 2019 movie based on San Francisco’s early queer culture. If you ran in certain circles, Brownstein was the guy to see.

In 1995 Brownstein presented at the first All-FTM Conference of the Americas.

The conference was organized by FTM International, a publication started by FTM Louis Sullivan. It began as FTM Newsletter in 1986. Efforts like this were instrumental in launching the FTM industry, not to mention the medical scandal that rages out of control today. It afforded an ambitious medical community easy access to confused females. The 1995 conference speakers also included FTM James (aka Jamison) Green who took the helm of FTM International upon Sullivan’s death in 1991. Green would be instrumental in attaining broad synthetic sex insurance coverage and also wrote policy for WPATH’s SOC.

Louis Sullivan was only 39 years old when she died from complications of AIDS. It was claimed she was the first ‘transman’ in history to succumb to the disease. The only drug available for ‘treatment’ at the time was the highly toxic AZT. The truth may never be known but it was reported that Sullivan participated in AIDS drug trials lending the possibility that, like many gay men at the time, she died from AZT toxicity.

Sullivan was repeatedly denied SRS approval from Stanford. While females represented a fraction of patients at the time, Sullivan was also heterosexual. Heterosexuals were not generally approved for ‘transition.’ Gatekeeping for services was a thing then and few gained approval. The tide though was changing.

Sullivan’s approval finally came from an organization called the Institute for Advanced Study on Human Sexuality (IASHS) in San Francisco. IASHS was in business for over 40 years from 1976 until 2018. According to Wikipedia it was, “integral to the development of humanistic sexology, emphasizing experiential techniques and sexual pleasure over positivist empiricism.” This is a place where disciples of Magnus Hirschfield, the Frankfurt School and Alfred Kinsey could thrive. One disciple, John Money, was infamous for his role in launching the gender industry and was a one-time member of the faculty.

Daniel Laub, a surgeon and also a co-founder of WPATH, also presented at the first FTM conference. Laub is known for his advances in transgender surgery on both males and females. He is notable for the surgical reconstruction of female genitalia into simalcrums of the male sex. Laub presented his first paper on the topic in 1974. Although female genitalia are not sacrificed for synthetic phalluses at near the rate of breasts, this too is a growing field of concern.

Laub also ran Stanford’s Gender Dysphoria Program where conference speakers FTMs Jamison Green and Steve Dain did go on to receive the green light to transition. An article from the time states that Stanford had more females than any other gender clinic (20%). Stanford’s program ran from 1968 until 1980. It is unclear if the program closed as did many others at the time or rather morphed into the new model that was being socially engineered by industry. Homosexuals, heterosexuals, males, females, young and old are now fair game. In this model anybody can be ‘trans.’ It is the nightmare of today.

Among other notable FTM conference speakers in 1995 were HRCs gay activist Larry Brinkin who was later charged with child pornography in 2014 and FTM Loren Cameron who later died of suicide in 2022.

Walt Heyer, a man who lived as a woman for 8 years, received counseling from HBIGDA’s founding President Paul Walker himself and tells a less than glowing story. As noted, the 70s were a time when most gender identity clinics were closing due to concerns. Heyer writes, “Since then, private surgeons have stepped in to take their place. Without any scrutiny or accountability for their results, their practices have grown, leaving shame, regret, and suicide in their wake.” Today public universities and medical institutions have returned to ignoring tragedies of the past.

The thing that was true in the latter part of the 20th Century and remains true today is that an over zealous medical industry with no guardrails and confused patients are a toxic mix. It is also true that changing the model of care for what were once called ‘transsexuals’ via tactics like word games, psychological manipulation, media influence, and NGOs, were drummed up long ago. Today the scale of this problem is immense and compounded by the expansion of new medical programs, advances in technology, and gobs of money.

It is now routine to experiment on an ever-increasing supply of young people with a larger ratio of females indoctrinated by the ‘gender’ lie. In medical institutions across the country humanistic sexology is the only way to view the sexed body of man. Surgeons are severing sex organs at unprecedented rates with the breasts of young women filling medical waste bins at countless facilities across the country daily.

Brownstein did receive some pushback in the early years but the surgeon himself who was interviewed for the Pritzker piece goes on to say, “Now they’re all doing it.” Brownstein is right at least in a sense. It is not that all doctors are doing it, but many are and the medical profession as a whole has embraced it. Dissent is not permitted. It is wide dissent that is needed if many are not to meet Heyer’s tragic predictions.

Passing the Buck

When Brownstein retired in 2013, Dr. Curtis Crane took his place passing on his top surgery techniques and expanding to include “bottom surgeries.” Glowing articles on Crane have been the media norm. The dangers of choosing Crane as a surgeon for years only came in chat rooms and parent blogs. Women seduced by the lies of ‘gender’ continue to find favor with Brownstein’s protégé despite lawsuits. They offer up their bodies for smooth chests and synthetic phalluses at Crane Center’s now 3 locations. The center claims to have performed over 1k phalloplasties since 2012 and more than 200 top surgeries a year.

A Breast Offering Factory

Attention will now be turned to the facility in South Florida where young women from all over the world flock to participate in the new religion called ‘gender’. While Dr. Crane has an infatuation with phalloplasties, Dr. Charles Garramone is laser focused on breasts. Garramone is just one of many surgeons doing this dirty work. One database lists 907 surgeons that perform top surgeries in the US today. Along with Garramone, 40 others participate in the madness in Florida alone. No doubt there are others.

Garramone’s marketing genius as well as social media influence and accomplices in industry have combined for a business venture that would have been impossible in Brownstein’s heyday. According to his own website he is, “the World’s authority on FTM Top Surgery,” claiming to have performed more FTM and FTN top surgeries than any other surgeon in the world.

Patents on medical procedures in the US are generally not enforceable and considered unethical by medical boards. Trademarks are different. A trademark is the marketing component of goods and services using words, graphics, and the like.

The Garramone Center opened in 2005. In 2008 the doctor started a YouTube channel. The following year he filed for the first 2 of 4 registered trademarks, ManSculpture® and MALESCULPTURE, for cosmetic and plastic surgery.

In 2009 he also posted his first of only 3 self-produced YouTube videos. In 2012 he went on to register for a trademark for MANSCULTPURE® undershirts and posted his second self-produced video.

A few years later in 2015 Garramone filed for a servicemark for GenSculpt® and MANSCULPTURE®. His trademark applications received registration approval while one, “FTM Top Surgery,” was cancelled. This is no surprise. The term “top surgery” was long ubiquitous in the industry.

The servicemark application goes into surgery details updated in 2021 as well as costs and travel accommodations.

It is unclear if Garramone’s surgeries differ from those of hundreds of other surgeons but these procedures are nothing new in the industry. Brownstein’s protégé, Crane, has a similar description. They all do. Garramone might be more skilled than others but what is novel are the words trademarked to perform surgeries.

His ManSculpture® Body Masculinization or MaleSculpture® trademarks delineate a procedure where liposuction is used to rid female body fat for a male-like look. Not only can FTMs save money, a doctor can sell more services under one sedation. Like his top surgery procedures, the doctor has commandeered words to sell services.

Patients are reminded:

The above is correct but these patients are not men, and nothing precludes plastic surgeons from using liposuction. Many in the industry call it “FTM body contouring.” What happened to truth in advertising?

Garramone’s 3 YouTube videos are accompanied by a playlist of 132 favorites. These are FTM social media influencers who populate YouTube’s internet feeds corrupting a generation of girls and young women growing up in a sick world. Stay tuned for next week when readers will learn how tech, social media influencers and other accomplices have come together for a perfect storm. In the meantime please share. The world needs to know this truth.