LEGALLY trans
Media, NGOs, and the LGBTQ+ Legal Empire
Strange Happenings
A strange thing happened on December 4th of 2024. A woman in medical drag argued before the US Supreme Court that TN’s law limiting “gender-affirming” care (SB1) violates the rights of adolescents. This is an historical first for a “transgender” identifying person in the US to be arguing before the highest court in the land. With a small frame and in men’s attire, a voice altered by testosterone use and ample facial hair to prove it, Chase Strangio, a female impersonating a male, presented her arguments. This post is not so much about Strangio’s arguments or about the case at all. That information can be found many places, but it is about how such a strange thing as this can happen. This is the story about the building of the LGBTQ+ legal empire and the industries the empire supports. For 4 decades the legal world has been setting the table for this moment.
FTM Strangio and MTF Laverne Cox’s appeared together at the 2019 Emmy Awards. This was no accident and not a “boy meets girl” kind of date. Cox tells us so. With embellished mannerisms, towering a foot over his date, and in his own medical drag, Cox begins, “I brought Chase because of this. October 8th. Title VII. Supreme Court.” Cox rattles off talking points while holding his rainbow bedazzled Edie Parker clutch. The clutch was also decorated with the talking points. Strangio further explains as large letters encircle her neck, T-R-A-N-S, and her finger, Q-U-E-E-R, pronouncing her captivity to the synthetic sex industry. “So October 8th everyone should be aware that the administration is asking the Supreme Court to make it legal to fire workers just because they are LGBTQ, and this is actually going to transform the lives of LGBTQ people and people who are not LGBTQ. Anyone who departs from sex stereotypes…” Strangio begins her part.
Strangio speaks of the Aimee Stephens case in which she served as an ACLU attorney. MTF Stephens was fired from a funeral home and his case was debated alongside an LGB discrimination case at the Supreme Court. “Transgender” was not just thrown into the mix for nothing. There is an agenda and Cox and Strangio are groomed for their roles.
Stephens would pass away from renal complications that may have been caused from cross sex hormone use. When Strangio says, “Our lives are really in danger,” she may mean it in a different way but there is no doubt the health and well-being of thousands of people are indeed in danger when they are coerced into this novel lifestyle and medical campaign. Stephens may have won at the Supreme Court, but this was not a win for someone no longer alive, and it will not be for countless others either.
Strangio also did not make a cameo in the 2020 Netflix documentary Discourse as the only non-actor alongside Cox and others for nothing. “Discourse is an unprecedented, eye-opening look at the transgender depictions in film and television, revealing how Hollywood simultaneously reflects and manufactures our deepest anxieties about gender,” begins the description. Just maybe Hollywood is helping to manufacture synthetic sex identities instead.
Cox got his first big break on the first season of I Want to work for Diddy in 2008. In 2009 he won an Outstanding Reality Program award from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) for Transamerican Love Story. This is not about reality. It is not about a civil rights cause. It is about programming the public for a false reality.
Evidence of this is presented by the $300 Discourse toolkits . There are toolkits for colleges, universities, and community groups, for industry professionals, for workplace DEI trainings, for legal professionals, and for working with young people exploring the latest fad (“gender identity”). It is only $150 for that last one. Each toolkit is supported by the Perspective Fund, The Harnisch Foundation, Just Films (part of the Ford Foundation) and Tides Foundation. The “young people” toolkit is also sponsored by GLAAD and Gay Straight Alliance (GSA) Network. The others also have specific funders. National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE), National Black Justice Coalition (NBJC), American Bar Association (ABA), Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund (TLDEF), Transgender Law Center, and Netflix provide countless ways to shuffle money around for this business venture.
Tides Foundation is founded and operated by one of the Rich White Men Institutionalizing Transgender Ideology, Drummond Pike. Ford Foundation and GLAAD are also funded by the same men pushing social change using the sexed bodies of youth. Creating stories for social change that pull at the heartstrings of a gullible populace has been a tool of this agenda. Hollywood is a golden ticket to tell these stories. But they are just stories. What lies behind these stories are what matters.
In 1998 (27 years ago!), GLAAD’s Media Reference Guide included a transgender section. This fits well into the timeline of coordinated efforts in the legal community as shown later in this post. GLAAD today has a Transgender Media Program. This includes media resources, a reporter guide, and medical association statements. There can be found “facts” from 35 medical organizations. Texas Medical Association, Texas Pediatric Association, and Ohio Children’s Hospital are listed among some of the more obvious ones like World Health Association (WHO), World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). GLAAD gives those “rich white men” a direct line of communication to the media.
The testimony by Ohio Children’s Hospital Association in 2023 against OH HB68 (against drugs and surgeries for gender confusion) and in support of Ohio’s multi-hospital foray into gender medicine is offered as a resource. “It is so unfathomable to hear the statements made regarding what pediatric providers do and don’t do when treating youth who are expressing a conflict between the sex they were assigned at birth and the gender with which they identify,” begins a statement from a professional at Children’s Hospital-Dayton. Spewing the usual talking points like “age-appropriate,” “following guidelines,” “evidence based,” “free from coercion and undue influence,” etc. comes next but they are all lies.
Also stated is the fact that no surgeries are part of children’s gender services in Ohio. That part is true, but a bit further down come the talking points from American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).
The delivery of gender affirming care is not a political issue, but rather a health care issue – Gender dysphoria is a medical diagnosis, not a political choice. ASPS firmly believes that plastic surgery services can help gender dysphoria patients align their bodies with whom they know themselves to be and improve their overall mental health and well-being. The Society will continue its efforts to advocate for full access to medically necessary transition care and stand up to those who oppose it – from the board rooms of big tech to Capitol Hill.”
States need to retain their gender clinics at all cost and affirm the lies. It is a waiting game for hospitals, like ones in Ohio, that may come to limit medical protocols for youth but have booming sex reassignment surgery centers prepped for the young specimens to age into their programs. Can there be an agenda sicker? Gender medical protocols as well as gender clinics need to come to a halt altogether. And not political? Read again the paragraph about Cox and Strangio’s date at the 2019 Emmys.
Like Hollywood, the nonprofit supporters are all about stories. The Harnisch Foundation, in addition to supporting Discourse and other LGBTQ+ friendly ventures, also supports 19th News, a network established in 2024 “to shine a light on stories that elevate the voices of women and LGBTQ+ Americans of diverse backgrounds.” Perspective Fund also funds storytellers for social change and have funded the HBO original The Trans List. This documentary shares the lives of some of America’s most influential trans stars like Caitlyn Jenner and Buck Angel. Is this documentation or indoctrination?
Peel back the glossy narratives on these characters and there can often be found unbecoming truths. Consider Buck Angel’s involvement in pushing FTM sex toys to underage females. It would take a book to unravel the onions of these nonprofits and the characters involved in this Hollywood saga. Alongside this saga the LGBTQ+ legal empire has also been built.
Legal LGBTQ+
Creating a legal association for gays and lesbians came to fruition at the height of the AIDS epidemic in the late 1980s. In 1988 the first Lavender Law Conference was held. The legal campaign to protect sexual orientation was on its way. The National Lesbian and Gay Law Association (NLGA) launched in 1989 becoming known as the LGB Bar. It would only be a few years later when in 1992 it became affiliated with the American Bar Association (ABA). By 1995 “transgender” was introduced into the mix becoming the first national organization to pass a resolution for “‘transgender’ inclusion in the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). While at one time half of US lawyers were members, this number stands at less than one quarter of the 1.3M lawyers in the US today. Perhaps the ABA’s LGBTQ agenda is part to blame.
Many professionals have questioned the AIDS narrative through the years with industry interests consistently getting the upper hand. In 2017, scientists at the Perth Group concluded that, “On the basis of the presently available data in the scientific literature, one has no choice but to conclude that whatever “HIV” is, it is not “the virus that causes AIDS”, or even “a real virus.”” Despite this confusion over what AIDS actually is and the harms that have come from AIDS and HIV medications, LGB would grow into LGBTQ+.
Sexual orientation received an enormous boost in public interest in these years. Funding for research and medications skyrocketed. Brick and mortar medical programs grew. Transactivists and allies got busy. NGOs swooped in for “support.” The medical protocols of AIDS and HIV would expand into more medical protocols for the “transgender” agenda.
Have pharmaceutical markets in AIDS/HIV drugs and now gender affirmation drugs and surgeries aided the success of this industry? Are evolving markets in pharmaceuticals, assisted artificial reproduction, synthetic biology, and transhumanist initiatives continuing to propel the LGBTQ+ agenda forward? Have homosexual men and now transgender populations been used for medical experimentation? Is this at least in part an effort to socially engineer a society for scientific agendas? Is it not time to pause and ask these questions?
The ABA and LGBTQ+
The ABA’s Dan Bradley started the Committee on Rights of Gay People becoming the Commission on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in 2007. Today the ABA has four goals. This commission is part of goal III, leading “the Association's commitment to diversity, inclusion and full and equal participation by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons in the Association, legal profession, and society.” Bradley would become the namesake of the committee’s highest honor, the Dan Bradley Award.
Today the ABA is infiltrated with the LGBTQ+ agenda. They provide an extensive list of “transgender resources,” printed the 2nd edition of Transgender Persons in the Law, and hold webinars like “Trans Awareness for Legal Professionals,” “Trans” has been around long enough now that holding a webinar with multiple sex-confused lawyers is easy.
The ABA also participates in projects like Opening Doors for LGBTQ Youth in Foster Care, a 2008 document for lawyers and judges. Among advisors are Caitlyn Ryan of the Family Acceptance Project discussed in Traumatizing American Families. This may as well be called shutting the doors on foster children. Other advisors hail from the Human Rights Campaign and other organizations captured by industry’s social engineering agenda.
Documents such as this always start with the premise of a false reality – an identity or a diagnosis is true. But are they? The purpose is not to educate professionals but to indoctrinate them into false beliefs. Their role is to be allies for an industry where children’s bodies are specimens for experimentation. Courtrooms are fast becoming dangerous places for children who fall prey to these professional allies.
The situation in some places is growing worse. Judge and MTF Victoria Kolakowaski happens to be the first transgender trial court judge in the country. He works in CA, the first “transgender” sanctuary state in the country.
Awarding Social Change / Awarding Markets
The ABA has been honoring LGBTQ+ attorneys with the Stonewall award since 2011. The first “transgender” identified recipient was FTM Stephen Whittle in 2014. There have been many others. Strangio received the honor in 2020 and Kolakowaski was the most recent recipient in 2024.
In 2024 the LGBTQ Bar presented the Dan Bradley Award to Bill Singer. In 2009 Singer launched LGBT Family Law Institute (FLI) a joint venture with the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) and the LGBTQ+ Bar. Among topics the institute covers are family creation, transgender issues, ART, and LGBTQ Youth. Singer is a fellow at Academy of Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Attorneys where potential clients can connect with lawyers and find LGBT ART resources.
LGBTQ Bar describes Singer as an advocate and attorney who “has been working to create and protect queer families for over 50 years.” Family creation is rendered impossible due to lifestyle choices and hence the need to “create” families/children, and to protect the process of child / family creation in law and medicine. These are lucrative markets for Singer and his colleagues. Singer has advocated for “co-parenting and gamete donation agreements,” protecting “non-genetic and non-gestational parents,” and access to fertility treatments regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI). He also advocates for what are now known as “confirmatory adoptions” which negate background checks despite the obvious, not to mention evidence, that adoptions deserve careful consideration.
The Center for Surrogacy Parenting claims that over 30% of their clientele comes from the LGBTQIA+ community. They were the first agency allowing gay couples to rent a woman to gestate artificially inseminated sperm. Risks to the baby or woman and the moral implications of renting humans for gestational purposes is overlooked. They partner with Ovation Donor Services for donor eggs and sperm and with Ovation Fertility for IVF lab services.
For “transgender “clients, sterility is possible rendering ART seductive. The 2022 14B global market in surrogacy was projected to expand to over 120B by 2032. The 30% LGBTQIA population just might be important for this massive growth.
Donor eggs, IVF, vitrification, ART show increasing market projections. How much of the market share do LGBTQ+ clientele represent in these industries? Insurer/ health product corporations are certainly ramping up LGBTQ+ business efforts. Cigna now has a synthetic sex candidate, LGBTQ+ directory and Evernorth Health Services to meet rising markets. The LGBTQ+ legal markets must expand too.
Law Schools and Social Change
OpenAI informs that law reviews “contribute to the continuous development of law by fostering scholarly analysis, improving the quality of legal education, and offer a valuable resource to both the legal community and the broader public.” In the early 90s LGBTQ+ law was a growing focus and several schools established reviews on the topic. Whether this anomaly has improved legal education and /or fostered societal good is debatable. After all, America is now engaged in child medical experimentation on the sex characteristics of its most vulnerable. This cannot be good.
American law schools have been at the heart of this legal affront to the nature of man. Tulane, American, Duke, Iowa, and Georgetown were among universities to focus on LGBTQ+ law. Tulane was the first launching the Tulane Journal of Law and Sexuality: A review of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Law in 1991. It also happens be the official journal of the ABA affiliate, the National LGBTQ+ Bar Association.
In 1992 the American University Journal of Gender Law and Policy began publication later becoming The Journal of Gender Social Policy and Law. The Duke Journal of Gender and the Law arrived on the scene in 1994. Two years later in 1996 came the Journal of Gender Law and Justice at the University of Iowa.
In 1999 Tulane would host the first symposium to recognize their LGBTQ+ law review titled, “Chronicling a Movement: A Symposium to Recognize the Twentieth Century Anniversary of the Lesbian/Gay Law Notes.” In the summer of that same year Georgetown University would launch Georgetown’s Gender and the Law. In the inaugural edition of Georgetown’s review can be found the full symposium held at Tulane earlier that year. The focus of two of the symposium articles were on “transgender” inclusion in law. While unclear if these articles were the first of their kind, they were certainly some of the earliest and predictive of things to come.
By 2000 the Child Health Act would allot funding for Duke to traumatize American families as leader of the National Center for Child Traumatic Stress along with UCLA. It is all a scheme to launch the synthetic sex industry on the youngest of citizens.
For the 1999 symposium “Chronicling a Movement,"Chai Feldblum, a lesbian Georgetown professor of law at the time penned the article, “Gay People, Trans People, Women: Is it all about Gender?” The article provides an account of the early years of “transgender” activism. FTM attorney at the National Center for Lesbian Rights for over 30 years now, Shannon Minter writes, “Getting Real About Transgender Inclusion in the Gay Rights Movement.” Feldblum and Minter certainly got real about attaching “transgender” to the LGB cause. They have been instrumental in propelling a lucrative industry forward.
Like Bill Singer, both Minter (in 2009) and Feldblum (in 2019) have also been bestowed the highest honor of the LGBTQ+ Bar, the Dan Bradley Award. In November of 2024 Minter would present on the state of the movement for the FLI’s annual meeting that is held each year during the annual Lavender Law Conference. Topics for 2024 included defining sex and parenthood, fertility insurance mandates, surrogacy issues, and more.
AIDS 40 Years Later
About that rainbow bedazzled Edie Parker clutch carried by MTF star Laverne Cox, a replica was auctioned off to support charity. The charity was NYC’s Anti-Violence Project, an NGO that spews the mainstream narrative for “LGBTIQ, HIV affected, and allies.” They claim that for over 40 years they have been getting people to “see us, hear us, believe us, and serve us.”
The truth though is harder to swallow. Society has been seeing, hearing, believing, and serving an industry for 4 decades. Now children are on the receiving end of this sick industry. The 1990s was a pivotal time on the heel of the AIDS scandal to unleash the LGB and the TQ+ agenda.
Strangio and others can yet depart from their delusions. With the multi-decade love bombing and funding though, cognitive dissonance seems to have settled in. As a young law student at Northeastern in the early 2000s, Strangio was led astray beginning her medical regimen and becoming a social change agent for industry. Healthy bodies until adulthood is not something the industry wants for children. Strangio, Feldblum, Minter and others have taken the reins and now indoctrinate youth into a system of harm. The money comes from “rich white men,” but people from all walks of life compose the foot soldiers at war with children’s bodies. It is a system that must end.
The trans industry is leading to trans humanism and it’s scary as hell! It’s anti- biology ,anti- reality as well as anti- human! How can this dangerous ideology be stopped?
I think there is a book to be written about how HIV / AIDS lay the groundwork for pharma viewing children (particularly parentless children) as fair game for medical experimentation.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/government-tested-aids-drugs-foster-kids-flna1c9443062